|
õô , , 123, ꡤΰ, 5 '2035 õ İȹ⺻ȹ' ϰ ִ. ̹ ȹ ܼ ְȯ Ѿ ṵ̈ ǥ ϰ ִ. ƿ ̳߰ ð ֹ Ȯ ϰ, ó ġ ü踦 Źͽ ȿ ڴٴ 鿡 .
õô ֹ δ ȭ ߴ. 4 20 ʿ 5 ּ 1 10%, 2 41% ߴ. ̸ ֹ δ ̰ Ȱ ȹ̴. ü ȭ ǥ ̵ ϸ ' ' ϴ ̸鿡, ȯ ڷ ä Ը å ذ Ϸ 縮 ִٴ ´.
ֹ ص ̱ ' (FAQ)' ۡԽϰ, Ȯ 'õ İȹȸ' ϴ ӵ ִ. õô 7 İȹȸ Ǹ ģ , 䱳 ߾Ưȸ Ǹ 10 ⺻ȹ ̴. Ư ٽ '' 6 1ϱ ϸ, 䱳ο Ǹ 8 ȹ̴.
ֹε ε ħ 糪 FAQ Խ ΰ ƴ϶, ݸ д ȭ ɼ ÿ ' ' å̴. ü ǥ ȭ ϴ ù ְ Ȯ 籹 ӹ ġ ϴ ӽù ƴٴ ̴. õô ױ ϰ, ð ֹε ұ ϰ ִ ' ü' ùε Ǻη ִ Ͽ ؾ ̴.
[ -AIȰ]
Yoo Kwang-jo, Director of the City Balance Bureau of Incheon Metropolitan City, said, "The establishment of this basic plan will be an important turning point to elevate Incheon's urban competitiveness to the next level. We will spare no administrative support so that deteriorated planned cities can successfully transition into sustainable future cities." Incheon Metropolitan City announced that it is fully promoting maintenance projects to improve the residential environment of deteriorated planned cities, such as Guwol and Yeonsu, and to transform them into sustainable future cities. Instead of the government significantly guaranteeing financial investment for expanding the wide-area transportation network or revitalizing the old downtown, it appears to be an approach of taking immediate enforcement of visible guideline preparation and review procedures as a means of promotion.
Currently, Incheon City is establishing the '2035 Incheon Metropolitan City Deteriorated Planned City Reconstruction Basic Plan' targeting a total of five districts, including Guwol, Yeonsu/Seonhak, Mansu 1/2/3, Galsan/Bupyeong/Bugae, and the Gyesan district. This plan aims for a systematic and wide-area reorganization of the urban spatial structure beyond simple residential environment maintenance. In addition, the plan laid forward an administrative posture to solidify the efficiency of the provincial maintenance project governance by monitoring the improvement of residential conditions, such as securing resident safety during night hours or vulnerable times, and establishing a cooperative system with related departments and autonomous districts.
Incheon City also adjusted the public contribution ratio to improve business feasibility and ease the burden on residents. In accordance with the ordinance enacted and promulgated on April 20, the public contribution ratio for the five districts was set at the legal minimum level of 10% for the first section and 41% for the second section. Through this, the city plans to reduce the burden on residents and induce smooth project promotion. Behind the packaging of the local government's relaxed regulatory indexes loudly exposed to the media as a core achievement of 'active administration' lies a complacent bureaucratic convenience attempting to defer the resolution of intrinsic conflicts, such as measures for relocation following large-scale maintenance, while leaving the public purpose of reclaiming development gains behind.
Furthermore, to increase residents' understanding, the city has produced and posted 'Leader District Q&A (FAQ)' on the city website, and is speeding up administrative support by promoting the formation of the 'Incheon Deteriorated Planned City Reconstruction Committee' to ensure professionalism and fairness in the project. Incheon City plans to finally announce the basic plan in October after completing the review by the Deteriorated Planned City Reconstruction Committee in July and passing through the review of the Central Special Committee of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. In particular, the 'Leader District,' which is the core of project promotion, will accept public contest applications until June 1, and the final selection is planned for August through consultation with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
In reality, the intrinsic problem confronted by frontline residents and real estate experts on-site is not the absence of public contest guidelines or whether an FAQ is posted, but rather the feasibility of expenses due to high interest rates and surging construction costs, and the 'jeonse crisis' that will occur when tens of thousands of households move simultaneously. Focusing solely on primary index calculations and schedule management by gathering at a situation room misses the mark of the competent authority's inherent duty, remaining a mere temporary fix. Incheon City must refrain from performance-accumulating public contests and concentrate its capabilities first on substantializing a 'field-linked permanent disaster prevention and relocation consultation body' where actual urban engineering experts and residents can constantly inspect supply-demand imbalance issues to directly adjust practical structural infrastructures so that citizens can actually feel it.
![]() |
ִȣ wneo9016@naver.com
ȳϼ :)
ʺڵ ϴ ø ִȣ Դϴ.
|
2026.05.30() 19:53
Ÿ Ź
























